Who is generally not considered a moral crusader in contemporary society?

The role of moral crusaders typically involves individuals or groups who advocate for specific ethical standards or moral values that they believe should be adopted by wider society. These individuals often seek to instigate social change based on their moral beliefs and may belong to categories such as activists, moral entrepreneurs, or politicians who push for policy changes reflecting their moral convictions.

In contrast, the public, while it may have collective opinions and influence, does not actively seek to champion a specific moral cause in the same way. The public can respond to moral campaigns and may be swayed by the efforts of activists or politicians, but it doesn’t inherently fit the active mold of a moral crusader. The public reacts and participates in discussions about morality but is generally more passive compared to those who engage directly in moral entrepreneurship, advocacy, or political efforts aimed at enforcing or promoting particular moral standards.

Thus, among the choices, the public is seen as less directly involved in the context of moral crusading, making it the least likely option when considering who is usually recognized as a moral crusader in contemporary society.