Marxist-inspired critical criminologists argue that which group does NOT set the agenda for public debate about crime?

Marxist-inspired critical criminologists assert that the agenda for public debate about crime is largely shaped by those in positions of power and influence, including academics, politicians, and the media. This perspective views crime and its narratives as heavily influenced by societal elites who determine what issues are considered important and warrant discussion.

In contrast, the public, while it plays a role in responding to crime and can influence certain discussions, does not primarily set the agenda. Instead, public opinion is often shaped by the representations curated by the media and the political discourse led by politicians and academics. These groups filter and present crime issues in ways that reflect their interests and ideologies, leaving the general public to engage with these predetermined narratives rather than initiating their own discussions. This dynamic illustrates a power imbalance where the public's voice is often marginalized in favor of the perspectives pushed by more dominant social forces.